<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Hillary Should Be Thanking Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idiocratic.com/news/2009/11/01/why-hillary-should-be-thanking-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idiocratic.com/news/2009/11/01/why-hillary-should-be-thanking-bill/</link>
	<description>A simple look at the current events in this mad world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:22:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.idiocratic.com/news/2009/11/01/why-hillary-should-be-thanking-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idiocratic.com/?p=155#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Just like President Bush, she is a very polarizing figure. People hate her and people love her. She failed in 2008 but I think that she still wants the presidency badly. I wouldn&#039;t put it past her to go for it in 2012, especially if Obama continues down the path he is on now.

I didn&#039;t write anything about the danger of the Clinton political machine. In fact, I really did not write anything negative about the Clintons at all so I am not sure why you are asking whether or not I was concerned about political machines for the last 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like President Bush, she is a very polarizing figure. People hate her and people love her. She failed in 2008 but I think that she still wants the presidency badly. I wouldn&#8217;t put it past her to go for it in 2012, especially if Obama continues down the path he is on now.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t write anything about the danger of the Clinton political machine. In fact, I really did not write anything negative about the Clintons at all so I am not sure why you are asking whether or not I was concerned about political machines for the last 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.idiocratic.com/news/2009/11/01/why-hillary-should-be-thanking-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idiocratic.com/?p=155#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Stage a coup?  Get real.  The Bush administration WAS a defacto coup.  It&#039;s ridiculous to suggest that she would stage a coup.  People hate Hillary enough as it is.

Since I&#039;m not familiar with your blog, were you concerned about political machines for the last 8 years or is it only now that you&#039;ve awakened to the danger?  Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stage a coup?  Get real.  The Bush administration WAS a defacto coup.  It&#8217;s ridiculous to suggest that she would stage a coup.  People hate Hillary enough as it is.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m not familiar with your blog, were you concerned about political machines for the last 8 years or is it only now that you&#8217;ve awakened to the danger?  Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
